anti-Zionism and antisemitism

A disagreement with Bob, who writes in a post in which I otherwise agree with a great deal

finally anti-Zionism which sees Zionism as a form of imperialism and takes a consistent opposition to all imperialisms without singling out Zionism as unique is wrong-headed, but not in itself antisemitic.

Bob may (or may not) be right that such anti-Zionisms are not (or not necessarily) antisemitic, but they’re certainly not merely wrong-headed, in the same way that branding Zionism (and no other nationalism) as racism or equating Zionism with apartheid is not merely wrong-headed. For it involves misrepresenting the views of (i.e. libelling) the huge proportion of Zionists who are not imperialists. It’s thus problematic in the same way that it’s problematic when Zionism is presented as uniquely evil (more so than other nationalisms), necessarily expansionist, etc.

One can disagree as to whether or not this libel is antisemitic. I tend toward the view that it probably is, insofar as it misrepresents the views of a large number of Jews (although not only of Jews), but seem to be moving toward a position according to which whether or not it’s antisemitic isn’t hugely importance, since I see anti-Israel sentiment and prejudice as worthy of opposition in themselves.

My tentative and provisional attempt to reformulate of Bob’s sentence thus looks something like this:

finally anti-Zionism which sees Zionism and all other nationalisms as a forms of imperialism and takes a consistent opposition to all imperialisms without singling out Zionism as unique is wrong-headed, but not in itself antisemitic.

British Passports and the Assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh

The liberal media in the UK &em; and for all I know, the illiberal media as well &em; is up in arms about the alleged use by the Mossad of apparently forged British (and other) passports in the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai last month. This reflects the summoning of Ron Prosor, Israeli ambassador to the UK, to the Foreign Office, and the fact that David Milliband, UK foreign minister, has referred to the assassination as ‘an outrage’.

I must confess that I find it difficult to think that Mr Milliband is so naive that he considers either state-sanctioned extra-judicial killings or the use by intelligence agencies of forged passports to be ‘outrageous’.

  1. News & Etc.

  2. Recent Comments

  3. Categories

  4. Donate