Foucault and the Iranian Revolution

From The University of Chicago Press:

In 1978, as the protests against the Shah of Iran reached their zenith, philosopher Michel Foucault was working as a special correspondent for Corriere della Sera and le Nouvel Observateur. During his little-known stint as a journalist, Foucault traveled to Iran, met with leaders like Ayatollah Khomeini, and wrote a series of articles on the revolution. Foucault and the Iranian Revolution is the first book-length analysis of these essays on Iran, the majority of which have never before appeared in English. Accompanying the analysis are annotated translations of the Iran writings in their entirety and the at times blistering responses from such contemporaneous critics as Middle East scholar Maxime Rodinson as well as comments on the revolution by feminist philosopher Simone de Beauvoir.

In this important and controversial account, Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson illuminate Foucault’s support of the Islamist movement. They also show how Foucault’s experiences in Iran contributed to a turning point in his thought, influencing his ideas on the Enlightenment, homosexuality, and his search for political spirituality. Foucault and the Iranian Revolution informs current discussion on the divisions that have reemerged among Western intellectuals over the response to radical Islamism after September 11. Foucault’s provocative writings are thus essential for understanding the history and the future of the West’s relationship with Iran and, more generally, to political Islam. In their examination of these journalistic pieces, Afary and Anderson offer a surprising glimpse into the mind of a celebrated thinker.

Danny Postel wrote a clear and concise review of the book, addressing the main arguments, including an analysis of Foucault’s Iran writings as a search for a postmodern revolutionary event and subject. The very good review is available from Postel’s website, here.

This entry was posted on Sunday, June 29th, 2008 at 9:13 am and is filed under feminism, Iran, postmodernism/poststructuralism, books, left-right overlap, social movements, anti-imperialism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Comments so far

  1. Originally from [New Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, whole no. 37, Summer 2004]
    http://www.wpunj.edu/newpol/issue37/cont37.htm

    Article now here for perusal:

    http://www.wpunj.edu/newpol/issue37/Afary37.htm

  2. The “right step in the wrong direction”?

    Examining Heidegger’s seduction by fascism and Foucault’s flirtation with the Iranian Revolution, Zizek suggests that these were the “right steps in the wrong direction.” He argues that while the revolutionary terror of Robespierre, Mao and the Bolsheviks ended in historic failure and monstrosity, this is not the whole story. There is, in fact, a redemptive moment that gets lost in the outright liberal-democratic rejection of revolutionary authoritarianism and the valorization of soft, consensual, decentralized politics.

    Zizek’s new book: In Defense of Lost Causes

Comment

Fields in bold are required. Email addresses are never published or distributed.

Some HTML code is allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
URIs must be fully qualified (eg: http://www.domainname.com) and all tags must be properly closed.

Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted.

Please keep comments relevant. Off-topic, offensive or inappropriate comments may be edited or removed.