<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why your Revolution is no Liberation!</title>
	<link>http://contested-terrain.net/why-your-revolution-is-no-liberation/</link>
	<description>Resource Page on Antisemitism and Related Issues</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: melanie</title>
		<link>http://contested-terrain.net/why-your-revolution-is-no-liberation/#comment-136</link>
		<author>melanie</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://contested-terrain.net/why-your-revolution-is-no-liberation/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>so im confused.  it seems like you are trying to critique binaristic thinking (good/bad, present world/other world), but you yourself traffic in SO many oversimplified binaries which remain undefined and ahistorical -- what is antisemitism?  what constitutes one as antisemitic?
how does tariq ramadan qualify as an anti-semite? what is islamism?  how does islamism vary in different contexts, histories, and countries?
im wary of a political discourse that generalizes things into one hegemonic category "antisemitism" "islamism"... this is universalizing and reductive, and contrary to the very types of critique and openness of discourse you seem to claim to want.

i am certainly willing to agree that some palestinian groups have done fucked up things to israelis and that, as you point out, there are double standards in so far as israel's fucked up policies are credited for all violence against jews/israel and not the same for muslims and islam.  but it seems to be reasonable (whatever reasonable may be...) that we can have a critique of israel's policies, state violence, and nationalist rhetoric without resorting to crude and ethically inappropriate comparisons to the warsaw ghetto, and without hating on Israel anymore than other State's violences (prisons, police, military, war, etc).

A critique of others' dogmatic anti-israel or anti-american sentiment is important and right on, but to dogmatically and ideologically flip to the other binary, unconditionally, and be pro-israel and pro-american or pro-corporations or whatever is totally... well... undialectical to say the least.  these are often the positions that anti-deutschers take up.  it doesn't preserve the force of radical critique that questions everything and asserts political positions contingently and out of necessity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so im confused.  it seems like you are trying to critique binaristic thinking (good/bad, present world/other world), but you yourself traffic in SO many oversimplified binaries which remain undefined and ahistorical &#8212; what is antisemitism?  what constitutes one as antisemitic?<br />
how does tariq ramadan qualify as an anti-semite? what is islamism?  how does islamism vary in different contexts, histories, and countries?<br />
im wary of a political discourse that generalizes things into one hegemonic category &#8220;antisemitism&#8221; &#8220;islamism&#8221;&#8230; this is universalizing and reductive, and contrary to the very types of critique and openness of discourse you seem to claim to want.</p>
<p>i am certainly willing to agree that some palestinian groups have done fucked up things to israelis and that, as you point out, there are double standards in so far as israel&#8217;s fucked up policies are credited for all violence against jews/israel and not the same for muslims and islam.  but it seems to be reasonable (whatever reasonable may be&#8230;) that we can have a critique of israel&#8217;s policies, state violence, and nationalist rhetoric without resorting to crude and ethically inappropriate comparisons to the warsaw ghetto, and without hating on Israel anymore than other State&#8217;s violences (prisons, police, military, war, etc).</p>
<p>A critique of others&#8217; dogmatic anti-israel or anti-american sentiment is important and right on, but to dogmatically and ideologically flip to the other binary, unconditionally, and be pro-israel and pro-american or pro-corporations or whatever is totally&#8230; well&#8230; undialectical to say the least.  these are often the positions that anti-deutschers take up.  it doesn&#8217;t preserve the force of radical critique that questions everything and asserts political positions contingently and out of necessity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [reader]</title>
		<link>http://contested-terrain.net/why-your-revolution-is-no-liberation/#comment-105</link>
		<author>[reader]</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://contested-terrain.net/why-your-revolution-is-no-liberation/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;you can download the reader for free at http://www.no-liberation-reader.tk/ now! get it, read it, spread the message!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can download the reader for free at <a href="http://www.no-liberation-reader.tk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.no-liberation-reader.tk/</a> now! get it, read it, spread the message!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [me]</title>
		<link>http://contested-terrain.net/why-your-revolution-is-no-liberation/#comment-104</link>
		<author>[me]</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://contested-terrain.net/why-your-revolution-is-no-liberation/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hi, great site.&lt;br /&gt;
check out my collection of links to antideutsch texts in english:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;del.icio.us/antideutschproject&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, great site.<br />
check out my collection of links to antideutsch texts in english:</p>
<p>del.icio.us/antideutschproject</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
